Native American groups have long argued that both the name of the team and the main logo are racist, with support for a change increasing alongside the Black Lives Matter movement following the death of George Floyd. The NFL side changed their social media handles on Thursday, switching to @WashingtonNFL, while redskins .com” was removed from the account's bio.
The new design, alongside the new name, will be present for the first time in Week 1 against divisional rivals Philadelphia Eagles. Washington Hogs: Some fans already wear pig noses to games to celebrate the nickname earned by the team’s offensive linemen during the Super Bowl-winning glory years of the 1970s and ’80s.
Though it originally was thought the Washington Football Team” would be a one-season stopgap after the franchise ditched its controversial name in the summer, it now appears the organization will use the new moniker for at least another year. It appears the Washington Football Team will keep its name.AP“I think next year is fast because of how the brand has to come together through uniforms, through approval processes through the league,” Wright said Tuesday.
It has been a hot button of discussion, but team owner Dan Snyder has continued to push back on retaining the name Redskins due to the long history the franchise has had under that word. The discussion around a possible name change for the WashingtonRedskins began to pick up steam back in 2013 as it brought up during a symposium in February that year at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian located in Washington, D.C. That led to the Oneida Indian Nation of New York to put forth radio ads that played during games in each city the team played in that year.
Team owner Dan Snyder stood firm through it despite the negative racial meaning of the word toward Native Americans. That included him coming out to voice in 2013 that he never plans to change the name of the franchise, which later that year in October with a letter to fans explaining why he won’t cave in.
However, the team kept the same imagery as to use one that honored head coach William Henry “Lone Star” Dietz, whose identity as a Native American was a hot topic of debate. The current logo of the franchise was proposed by Walter Wetzel, a former Blackfeet tribal chairman and past president of the National Congress of American Indians, back in 1972.
Since then, the franchise has retained the imagery and name that has continued to garner a strong push for an entire overhaul. The conversation over the WashingtonRedskins team name has become a pressing topic as of late, especially with the recent social injustice issues that the black community continues to face.
Commissioner Roger Goodall also chimed in stating on Friday that the NFL has continued to have discussions with Dan Snyder with the hope of making that change. Jul 03, 2020Image via Joe Robbins/Getty It's unclear how prepared Snyder and company are for this or how quickly it could be done with NFL training camp set to begin in less than a month.
As Adam Shelter pointed out on Twitter, a team changing their name without moving cities has happened before, most notably with the Tennessee Titans changing from the Oilers. It's way past the time for the Washington football team to get a new identity, and this should surely put other franchises like the Cleveland Indians on notice that they'll probably have to do the same.
The fictional D.C. team from the 2000 movie The Replacements with Keanu Reeves as the starting QB not only had a great name in the Sentinels, but also had a pretty great color scheme and logo. This seems like an easy move all around, and maybe they could even get Keanu as an official ambassador for the team.
Pigskins obviously already has the football connection, but also fits with the section of the fan base that calls themselves “The Hogs.” This is similar to Pigskins, but would easily fit with the theme of the team already and would be an easy switch because you could keep the color scheme and everything pretty much the same.
The WashingtonRedskinsname controversy involved the name and logo used until 2020 by the National Football League (NFL) franchise located in the Washington metropolitan area now known as the Washington Football Team. Native American groups had questioned the use of the Redskins name and image since the 1960s; the topic began receiving widespread public attention in the 1990s.
In July 2020, following a wave of racial awareness and reforms in wake of national protests after the killing of George Floyd, major sponsors of the league and team threatened to stop supporting them until the name was changed. The team initiated a review which resulted in the decision to retire its name and logo, playing as the Washington Football Team pending adoption of a more permanent name.
Native Americans demanding a name change included tribal nations, national tribal organizations, civil rights organizations, and individuals. The largest of these organizations, the National Congress of American Indians, counted the enrollment of its member tribes as totaling 1.2 million individuals in 2013.
The Washington team was only one example of the larger Native American mascot controversy, but it received more public attention because modern dictionaries define the name as derogatory or insulting and because the team has its home in the nation's capital. The team headquarters is in Ashburn, Virginia and its home stadium, FedExField, is in Landover, Maryland.
The name controversy was a factor in the team's departure from Washington, D.C. in 1997, and remained a barrier in discussions of the location of a new stadium. Support for continued use of the name Redskins came from the team's owners, management, the NFL Commissioner, and a majority of fans, which include some Native Americans.
Supporters said that the name honors the achievements and virtues of Native Americans, and that it was not intended in a negative manner. Some, such as former team president Bruce Allen, also pointed to the use of Redskins by three high school teams, two on reservations, that have a Native American student majority.
Supporters asserted that a majority of Native Americans were not offended by the name based upon a national poll by Rosenberg Public Policy Center in 2004. In a commentary published soon after that poll, 15 Native American scholars collaborated on a critique that stated that there were so many flaws in the Rosenberg study that rather than being a measure of Native American opinion, it was an expression of white privilege and colonialism.
Specific criticism of the methodology includes the use of self-reporting to identify Native Americans, which violated the basic principles supporting the validity of public opinion polling. In May 2016, The Washington Post published a poll that duplicated the central question posed in 2004, yielding an identical result.
A 2019 study by UC Berkeley found that 49% of Native Americans found the name offensive, rising to 67% of those who said they regularly participated in native or tribal culture. Team logo on a helmet exhibited at the Pro Football Hall of Fame.
The depiction of a Native American as a team emblem was first introduced in 1937. In 1933, the football team that shared both the name and playing field with the Boston Braves baseball team moved to Fenway Park, already home to the Boston Red Sox. Co-owner George Preston Marshall changed the name to the Redskins, more likely to avoid confusion while retaining the Native American imagery of the team than to honor coach William Henry “Lone Star” Dietz, whose identity as a Native American was debated.
The logo for the NFL Braves was similar to the Redskins logo, a Native American head in profile with braids and trailing feathers. A redesigned logo introduced in 1972 was proposed by Walter Wetzel, a former Blackfeet tribal chairman and past president of the National Congress of American Indians, and was modeled after the likeness on the Buffalo nickel.
Members of the Blackfeet tribe express a range of opinions, from support to indifference to strong opposition to the Redskins name based upon their personal experiences. Advocates of changing the team's name said that stereotypes of Native Americans had to be understood in the context of a history that includes conquest, forced relocation, and organized efforts by federal and state governments to eradicate native cultures, such as the boarding schools of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Word mark used by the Redskins (1972–2019)The historical context for the emergence in the Americas of racial identities based upon skin color was the establishment of colonies which developed a plantation economy dependent upon slave labor. Prior to the colonial era, many Europeans identified themselves as Christians rather than white.
Documents from the colonial period indicate that the use of “red” as an identifier by Native Americans for themselves emerged in the context of Indian-European diplomacy in the southeastern region of North America, before later being adopted by Europeans and becoming a generic label for all Native Americans. 627–8 Linguistic evidence indicates that, while some tribes may have used red to refer to themselves during the Pre-Columbian era based upon their origin stories, :634 the general use of the term was in response to meeting people who called themselves “white” and their slaves “black”.
In the debate over the meaning of the word “redskin”, team supporters frequently cite a paper by Ives Goddard, a Smithsonian Institution senior linguist and curator emeritus, who asserts that the term was a direct translation of words used by Native Americans to refer to themselves and was benign in its original meaning. In an interview Goddard admits that it is impossible to verify if the native words were accurately translated.
The “positive” stereotypes allow fans and supporters to honestly state that they are honoring Native Americans, but this is “forcing your idea of what it is to honor those people onto them and that, fundamentally, is disrespectful.” Sociologist James V. Felon makes a more explicit statement that Goddard's article is poor scholarship, given that the conclusion of the origin and usage by Natives as “entirely benign” is divorced from the socio-historical realities of hostility and racism from which it emerged.
Advocates of changing the name emphasize current meanings in dictionaries of American English, which include “usually offensive”, “disparaging”, “insulting”, and “taboo”. Such meanings are consistent with the usage found in books in the period between 1875 and 1930, which is after that studied by Goddard.
John McWhirter, an associate professor of linguistics at Columbia University, compares “redskin” becoming a slur to other racial terms, such as “Oriental”, which acquired implied meanings associated with contempt. A controversial etymological claim is that the term emerged from the practice of paying a bounty for Indians, and that “redskin” refers to the bloody scalp of Native Americans.
Although official documents do not use the word in this way, a historical association between the use of “redskin” and the paying of bounties can be made. In 1863, a Winona, Minnesota, newspaper, the Daily Republican, printed an announcement: “The state reward for dead Indians has been increased to $200 for every red-skin sent to Purgatory.
This sum is more than the dead bodies of all the Indians east of the Red River are worth.” A news story published by the Atchison Daily Champion in Atchison, Kansas, on October 9, 1885, tells of the settlers “hunt for redskins, with a view of obtaining their scalps” valued at $250.
For sociologist C. Richard King the lack of direct evidence does not mean that contemporary Native people are wrong to draw an association between a term that emphasizes an identity based upon skin color and a history that commodified Native American body parts. Trademark cases The meaning of the term “redskin” was addressed in two cases challenging the trademark registrations held by Pro-Football, Inc., the team's corporate entity.
The challenge was based upon a provision of the Latham Act which prohibited the registration of any mark that “may disparage persons, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute.” The first case, filed in 1992 by Sudan Shown Hard and six other Native American leaders resulted in the cancellation of the federal registrations for the Redskins marks by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (STAB); however in 2005 the United States District Court for the District of Columbia reversed the STAB's decision on the grounds of insufficient evidence of disparagement.
Subsequent appeals were also rejected on the basis of caches, that the Native American petitioners had pursued their rights in an untimely manner. A second case was filed with younger plaintiffs not affected by caches, led by Amanda Black horse.
The linguistic expert for the petitioners, Geoffrey Nun berg, successfully argued that whatever its origins, redskins was a slur at the time of the trademark registrations, based upon the passages from books and newspapers and the movie clips in which the word is inevitably associated with contempt, derision, condescension, or sentimental paeans to the noble savage. “ Nigger also began as a benign reference to skin color, only to become a racial slur through disparaging use.
On June 18, 2014, the STAB again voted to cancel the trademarks in a two to one decision that held that the term redskins is disparaging to a “substantial composite of Native Americans.” Evidence of disparagement include the frequent references to “scalping” made by sportswriters for sixty years when reporting the Redskins' loss of a game, and passages from movies made from the 1940s to the 1960s using “redskin” to refer to Native Americans as a savage enemy.
The STAB majority held that the NCAA represented about 30 percent of Native Americans during the time in question, which the Board found satisfied the substantial composite test of the trademark law. In December 2015, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the disparagement prohibition in the trademark law in a case (Metal v. Tam) involving a denial of trademark registration to the Asian-American band The Slants.
The majority opinion stated, in part, that “whatever our personal feelings about the mark at issue here, or other disparaging marks, the First Amendment forbids government regulators to deny registration because they find speech likely to offend others.” On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Tam, stating “The disparagement clause violates the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause.
On June 29, 2017, both the Native American petitioners and the Justice Department withdrew from any further litigation now that the Supreme Court has rendered the legal issue moot. While team owner Daniel Snyder expresses the opinion that the court decision is a victory for the team, the Executive Director of the NCAA asserts that the name remains a slur, and the decision that grants it First Amendment protection does not alter any of the arguments against its continued use.
Use by Native Americans Supporters of the Redskins name note that three predominantly Native American high schools use the name for their sports teams, suggesting that it can be acceptable. However, in 2013 the principal of one of these, Red Mesa High School in TEEC Nos Po's, Arizona, said that use of the word outside American Indian communities should be avoided because it could perpetuate “the legacy of negativity that the term has created”.
TEEC Nos Po's, on the Navajo Nation, is 96.5% Native American. Bellini, Washington, a town within a reservation of the Spokane people, is 79.3% Native American.
In 2014, Bellini High School voted to keep the Redskins name. Native American writer and attorney Gas Ross compares Native American use of variations of the word “redskin” with African-American use of variations of the word “nigger”; specifically Natives calling each other “skins” as analogous to “nigga”.
Ross argues that the use of terms by some members of minority communities does not mean that the same may be used by outsiders; this is generally recognized by white people with regard to black expressions, yet whites feel free to say how Natives should feel about “redskin”. Ross also notes that there is no consensus among Natives regarding either opposition to the Washington team's use of the name, or the importance of the issue compared to more immediate concerns.
However, in response to the argument that Native Americans ought to focus on social issues larger than a team name, Ross stated that “Native people shouldn't be forced to choose between living or racial discrimination. In July 2020, amidst the removal of many names and images as part of the George Floyd protests, a group of investors worth $620 billion wrote letters to major sponsors Nike, FedEx and PepsiCo encouraging pressure on the Redskins to change their name.
FedEx called on the team to change its name on July 2, 2021. The same day, Nike removed Redskins apparel from its website.
At the beginning of the protests, when the Redskins participated in Blackout Tuesday on June 2, 2021, congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez responded, “Want to really stand for racial justice? Subsequently, Washington, D.C. mayor Muriel Bowser interrelated her position that the name is an impediment to the team's return to a stadium in the District of Columbia.
A statue of the team's founder, George Preston Marshall has been removed from the grounds of JFK Stadium after being spray-painted with the words “Change the Name “. The management of the stadium stated that the statue would not return, and that its removal was long overdue.
In 2017, when professional sports dealt with a number of racial issues, from individual acts by players to widespread protests during the National Anthem, some commentators speculated why there had been no action to address the stereotyping of Native Americans, including the decision to have the WashingtonRedskins host a game on Thanksgiving. In February 2013 a symposium on the topic was held at the Smithsonian's National Museum of the American Indian in Washington, D.C. Subsequently, the Oneida Indian Nation of New York sponsored a series of radio ads in each city to coincide with games of the 2013 season, each featuring a targeted message.
A broader range of persons spoke in favor of change or open discussion, including local government leaders, members of Congress, and President Barack Obama. Statements in support of a name change by academic, civil rights and religious organizations were added to those that Native American groups have been making for decades.
The issue is often discussed in the media in terms of offensiveness or political correctness, which reduces it to feelings and opinions, and prevents full understanding of the historical, psychological and sociological context provided by academic research on the negative effects of the use of Native American names and images by sports teams. The effect of stereotyping on high or low expectations, confidence, and academic performance has been well-established.
This effect is enhanced due to the invisibility of Native Americans in mainstream society and media, leaving stereotypes as the primary basis for thinking about the abilities and traits associated with Natives, including the roles and opportunities Natives Americans envision for themselves. Furthermore, even when stereotypes are positive (e.g. “Native Americans are spiritual”), they may have a limiting, detrimental effect on individuals.
Stereotyping may directly affect the academic performance and self-esteem of Native American youth, whose people face high rates of suicide, unemployment, and poverty. Native Americans opposed to mascots point to the oversimplification of their culture by fans “playing Indian” with no understanding of the deeper meaning of feathers, face paint, chants, and dancing.
Richard Lap chick, director emeritus of Northeastern University's Center for the Study of Sport in Society, wrote: “Could you imagine people mocking African Americans in black face at a game? Yet go to a game where there is a team with an Indian name, and you will see fans with war paint on their faces.
The unofficial mascot of the Redskins team was Zeta Williams (aka Chief ZEE), an African American man who attended games for 38 years beginning in 1978 dressed in a red faux “Indian” costume, complete with feathered war bonnet and rubber tomahawk. Other fans dress in similar costumes for games.
In a report published by the Center for American Progress summarizing the research on “The Real Impact of Native Mascots and Team Names on American Indian and Alaska Native Youth”, a case is made that the public debate misses the point, since individual opinions on either side do not matter given the measurable effects on the mental health of Native American young people exposed to such misrepresentations of their ethnic identity, and the often hostile or insulting behavior of non-natives that occur when teams with such names and mascots play. Clinical Psychologist Michael Friedman writes that the use of Native imagery, in particular the use of a dictionary defined slur, is a form of bullying, the negative impact of which is magnified by its being officially sanctioned.
The majority of scholars argue that the use of any stereotype, whether positive or negative, is a hindrance to the advancement of the targeted group. The national organizations representing several academic disciplines, after reviewing the research done on the issue, have passed resolutions calling for the end of all Native American mascots and images in sports.
The executive board of the nation's leading organization of scholars of U.S. history approved a resolution in April 2015: “The Organization of American Historians hereby adds its voice to the growing demands by Native American organizations, our sister disciplines, and conscientious people of all ethnic backgrounds, to change the name and logo of the Washington Redskins '.” Protesters of the name, 2014In the 1940s the National Congress of American Indians (NCAA) created a campaign to eliminate negative stereotyping of Native American people in the media.
Over time, the campaign began to focus on Indian names and mascots in sports. The NCAA maintains that teams with mascots such as the Braves and the Redskins perpetuate negative stereotypes of Native American people, and demean their native traditions and rituals.
The NCAA issued a new report in 2013 summarizing opposition to Indian mascots and team names generally, and the WashingtonRedskins in particular. In the trademark case, the STAB placed significance on the NCAA opposition, estimating that the organization represented about 30% of the Native American population at the time the trademarks were granted, which met their criteria for a “substantial composite” of Native Americans finding the name disparaging.
In its amicus brief filed in the case, the NCAA states that the combined enrollment of its member tribes in 2013 was 1.2 million individuals. Many tribal councils have passed resolutions or issued statements regarding their opposition to the name of the WashingtonRedskins, including the Cherokee and Comanche Nations of Oklahoma, the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, the Inter-Tribal Council of the Five Civilized Tribes, the Oneida Indian Nation (New York), the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (North Dakota) and the United South and Eastern Tribes (USED).
In April 2014, Navajo Nation Council voted in favor of a statement opposing the name of the Washington team, as well as other disparaging references to American Indians by other professional sports franchises. Other Native American groups advocating change include: the Native American Bar Association of DC, the National Caucus of Native American State Legislators, and the Society of American Indian Government Employees.
Individual Native Americans who are or have been actively opposed to the Redskins name include: At its 2013 annual conference, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights (LC CHR), which includes the NAACP and the ACLU as members, passed a unanimous resolution of the 85 representatives present that, while recognizing that a business has the First Amendment right to use any name that it chooses, others need not be complicit in the use of a pejorative and insulting name ; and calling upon all Federal, state and local government entities “to end any preferential tax, zoning, or policy treatment that could be viewed as supporting the franchise as long as it retains its current team name “.
The resolution also commended the “current and former government officials, media outlets, and other entities that have encouraged the WashingtonRedskins franchise to change its team name or that have refused to be complicit in promoting the current team name “. In response, the team released a brief statement reiterating their previous position, and quoting two individuals as being both Native American and Redskins fans who do not want the name to change.
The Fritz Pollard Alliance, a non-profit organization closely allied with the NFL on civil rights issues, announced its support of a name change in 2015 after repeated attempts to discuss the issue with the team owner and representatives. An attorney for the Alliance, N. Jeremy Guru, an American University law professor, made a study of the controversy in which he concluded that Native Americans are justified in finding the name offensive.
In 2013 a group of 61 religious leaders in Washington, D.C., sent a letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodall and team owner Dan Snyder stating their moral obligation to join the Change the Mascot movement due to the offensive and inappropriate nature of the name which causes pain whether that is intended. In June 2015, the United Church of Christ General Synod passed a resolution calling for a stop to using images or mascots that could be demeaning to the Native American community.
In 2018 a Native American employee filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Energy claiming that the agency racially discriminated against her by allowing other employees to discuss the WashingtonRedskins football team and display Redskins paraphernalia at work. She also alleges that the Department of Energy retaliated against her after she raised concerns about the Redskins following in the office.
The United States District Court, District of Columbia dismissed the discrimination claim on the basis that the derogatory nature of the team name is in dispute, and that the law does not require employers to take sides in that dispute. In addition, while accepting that the name is hurtful to the employee, discussion of a local football team by co-workers is not equivalent to the use of a hurtful term directed toward an individual.
Although often assumed to be a debate of recent origins, local Washington, D.C. newspapers published news items on the controversy many times since at least 1971, all in response to Native American individuals or organizations asking for the name to be changed. National protests began in 1988, after the team's Super Bowl XXII victory, prompting numerous Native Americans to write letters to Redskins owner Jack Kent Cooke ; others boycotted Redskins products and protested, but Cooke rejected the possibility of change.
There was a protest of about 2,000 people at the 1992 Super Bowl between the Redskins and the Buffalo Bills ; the American Indian Movement's (AIM) Vernon Belle court was one of the main organizers of the protest. Since 2013, picketing at stadiums occurred occasionally when the Redskins played, particularly in cities with a significant population of Native Americans, such as Dallas, Denver and Minneapolis.
At a protest in Philadelphia in 2017, Native Americans pointed out the irony of NFL players making a statement opposing racial injustice by “taking a knee” for the National Anthem while one of the teams taking the field continues to use a racially offensive name and logo. Playing in Minnesota for the first time since 2014, hundreds of Native Americans protested against the team name outside of U.S. Bank Stadium during the game on October 24, 2019.
On December 8, 2019, members of the Wisconsin Indian Education Association's Indian Mascot and Logo Task Force led a protest at Lambeau Field in Wisconsin. The Oneida Nation sponsored a video shown on the Jumbo tron during the game expressing pride in being Native American as the antithesis of the message sent by the Redskins name and logo.
FedEx owns the naming rights to the team's stadium, FedExField, through 2026, and had been the only corporate sponsor officially subject to boycotts by Native Americans: the Osage Nation, the Native American Rights Fund (ARF), and the Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes, the largest tribe of Native Alaskan peoples. On December 13, 2017, a Native American group, Rising Hearts, created a Twitter campaign and several parody websites including one for the team that made it appear that the Redskins had agreed to change its name to the Washington Red hawks for the 2018 season.
The organizers stated that their intention was to stimulate debate that will eventually lead to an actual name change. Following the February 2013 symposium “Racist Stereotypes and Cultural Appropriation in American Sports” at the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian, 10 members of Congress sent a letter to the Redskins owner and the NFL Commissioner requesting that the name be changed since it is offensive to Native Americans.
In response, Daniel Snyder told USA Today : “We'll never change the name. Snyder addressed an open letter to fans that was published in The Washington Post on October 9, 2013; in which he stated that the most important meaning of the name is the association that fans have with memories of their personal history with the team.
Like many Native American organizations across the country, members of our staff and extended community find the name offensive.” Snyder's response, and that of other supporters and fans, reflects the psychology of identification with sports teams.
Self-esteem becomes bound to the players and the team, with many beneficial but also some unfortunate consequences, including denial or rationalization of misbehavior. In June 2013, NFL commissioner Roger Goodall defended the name by citing its origins, traditions and polls that support its popularity.
Bruce Allen addressed a letter dated May 23, 2014, to then Senate majority leader Harry Reid repeating the position that the name was originated by Native Americans to refer to themselves, that the logo was also designed and approved by Native American leaders, and that the vast majority of both Native Americans and the public do not find the name offensive. Conservative columnists George Will and Pat Buchanan stated that opponents of the team name are being oversensitive, although Charles Kraut hammer drew a parallel between the evolution of “Afro-American” and “Redskin” from being in common use to being condescending and insulting.
W. James Angle III, Rich Lowry, and Dennis Prayer wrote that outrage over mascots is manufactured by white liberals, rather than being the authentic voice of Native Americans. Three Virginia Indian leaders said in 2013 that they are not offended by the nameRedskins but are more concerned about other issues such as the lack of Federal recognition for any Virginia tribe.
Robert “Two Eagles” Green, retired chief of the Fredericksburg area Patawomeck Tribe, stated on a radio talk show he would be offended if the team changed its name. In an article in The American Spectator, the chief of the Patawomeck Tribe, John Lighter, said that while he was not offended by the current name, he would support changing the team to the Washington Potomac's.
On November 25, 2013, as part of the NFL's “Salute to Service” month and Native American Heritage month, the WashingtonRedskins recognized four members of the Navajo Code Talkers Association briefly during a commercial break. This action was criticized by Amanda Black horse, also Navajo, who described it as a publicity stunt.
In April 2014, Navajo Nation Council voted in favor of a statement opposing the name of the Washington team, as well as other disparaging references to American Indians by other professional sports franchises. Later that year, members of the Navajo and Zuni Tribes and students from the Red Mesa Redskins High School attended a Redskins vs. Cardinals game as guests of the Washington team.
In 2014 the Redskins released a two-minute video on YouTube entitled Redskins is a Powerful Name in which several Native Americans express their support for the team. Of the fourteen individuals, five are members of the Chippewa Cree tribe on the Rocky Boy Indian Reservation in Montana and are associated with the Team Redskins Rodeo club.
Two are Mike Wetzel and Don Wetzel, Jr. (Blackfeet), descendants of the logo designer, and the six others are members of various tribes and state that they are fans of the team and find nothing wrong with the name, or think it is positive. One of the individuals in the video is Mark One Wolf, who was reported as being born Mark E. Dance in Washington, D.C., of African-American and Japanese descent.
In July 2020, the Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County, Virginia, which is the location of the corporate headquarters of the team, sent a letter to the owner urging a change. In the mid-2010s, the majority of those advocating a name change were Democrats, though there was no indication that the issue is of any real significance in electoral decisions given that Native Americans are such a small percentage of the electorate and are not likely to influence the outcome of any election.
There are only eight states where Natives make up greater than 2 percent of the population: Alaska, Arizona, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wyoming. However, polls during that period showed a definite political difference in the opinion of the public, with only 58% of Democrats opposing a name change versus 89% of Republicans.
Statements by political figures have generally been expressions of personal opinion rather than recommendations for government action. There have also been non-binding resolutions advocating name change proposed in New Jersey and passed in Minneapolis, New York State and California.
Five Democratic Senators declined to sign the letter, and Republicans were not invited to do so. During his 2016 campaign, President Donald Trump defended the name.
DC Metro area jurisdictions Much of the local political discussion has been about the location of a stadium, beginning in the 1990s when a Maryland location was chosen for what is now FedExField. The mayors of Washington asserted that a return to the District of Columbia was contingent upon a name change, a possibility the team had rejected.
For many years, beginning with the departure of the Baltimore Colts, the Redskins were the only NFL team in a large area from Maryland into the southern states. This is slowly changing as Maryland NFL fans move to the Baltimore Ravens.
Virginia fans were the more numerous and dedicated supporters of the Redskins, and the state and local governments used economic incentives to encourage the team's relocation of its facilities there, and maintain that the name is entirely a business decision for the team to make. Several Maryland politicians stated that the name should change, but governor Larry Hogan at that time opposed any change, also citing the desire to keep the stadium in Maryland.
In addition to several direct sponsors advocating change in 2020, retailers Amazon, Nike, Target and Walmart withdrew Redskins merchandise from their stores and websites. Two professors at the Goleta Business School at Emory University summarized their research in a 2014 New York Times editorial.
They found that studies of college teams that have changed their names and mascots indicate that doing so has a long-term financial benefit. While vocal opponents of change often threatened withdrawal of support, this never materialized.
There have been no name changes by professional teams, though a comparison of NFL teams shows the highest negative trend in brand equity affects the WashingtonRedskins and the Kansas City Chiefs, calling into question the business logic of retaining Native American names or logos that are offensive to even a minority. The number of high schools using the Redskins name has been in steady decline, 40% having had local efforts to change the name.
By December 2017, the number of high school Redskins had continued to decline from 62 to 49, including four affected by a 2015 California law. Since 2017, three additional schools in Briggs, Idaho, Paw Paw, Michigan and Anderson Township, Ohio have changed, leaving a total of 46 high schools continuing to use the name.
While varying somewhat, national opinion polls consistently indicated that a majority of the public did not advocate a name change: 79 percent (April 2013), 60 percent (June 2014), and 71 percent (September 2014). In three polls, although they supported the team name, 59 percent, 56 percent, and 53 percent of DC, Maryland, and Virginia fans also said that the word “redskin” is offensive to Native Americans in at least some contexts.
The September 2014 national poll found that 68 percent think the name is not disrespectful of Native Americans, 19 percent say it shows “some” disrespect, and 9 percent say it is “a lot” disrespectful. In May 2016, The Washington Post released a poll of self-identified Native Americans that 90% of the 504 respondents were “not bothered” by the team's name.
NCAA Executive Director Jacqueline Data stated “The survey doesn't recognize the psychological impacts these racist names and imagery have on American Indian and Alaska Natives. The Native American Journalists Association issued a statement calling the publication of the poll, and the reporting of its significance, as not only inaccurate and misleading but unethical.
The Washington Post editorial board continued to support changing the name, citing opposition to such mascots by Native American tribes, which has resulted in continued retirement of Redskins by high schools such as in Briggs, Idaho in 2019. An alternative method to standard opinion polls was used by the Center for Indigenous Peoples Studies at California State University, San Bernardino.
Most Native American survey respondents were collected at pow-wows, a form of non-probabilistic convenience sampling. 67% of the Native Americans (n=66) polled agreed with the statement that Redskins is racial or racist.
The response from non-natives was almost the opposite, with 68% responding that the name is not offensive. In a 2019 poll by UC Berkeley, 38% of self-identified Native Americans responded that they were not bothered by the WashingtonRedskinsname while 49% felt it was offensive.
However, for study participants who were heavily engaged in their native or tribal cultures, 67% said they were offended, for young people 60%, and those with tribal affiliations 52%. ^ Originally a translation of 18th-century Mississippi Valley French Peak Rouge, Native American person (peak, skin + rouge, red), a translation of non-deprecatory Native American self-designations such as Fox meeshkwinameshkaata, literally, “one having red skin” : mesh kw-, red + -i-nameshk-, skin + CAA-, to have + -ta, participle suffix (used in opposition to designations of persons of European origin as waapeshkinameshkaata, “one having white skin” : waspish-, white + -i-nameshk-, skin + CAA-, to have + -ta, participle suffix).
^ In 2016, Federal recognition was granted to the Monkey Tribe of Virginia. “In Minnesota, zero Native Americans protest Redskins name ".
Washington's football team to call itself Washington Football Team until it settles on a new name ". “Delays Push Back Stadium's Chances for 1995 Opening”.
^ a b “Leading National Civil Rights and Racial Justice Organizations Announce Joint Opposition to Washington NFL Team Locating New Stadium in District of Columbia”. “The Truth about the Redskins Name and Logo” (PDF).
“Most Indians Say Name of Washington Redskins Is Acceptable While 9 Percent Call It Offensive”. “Indigenous Voice and Vision as Commodity in a Mass-Consumption Society: The Colonial Politics of Public Opinion Polling”.
^ John Woodrow Cox; Scott Clement; Theresa Vargas (May 19, 2016). “New poll finds 9 in 10 Native Americans aren't offended by Redskins name ".
Washington Redskins name, Native mascots offend more than previously reported”. “1933 news article refutes cherished tale that Redskins were named to honor Indian coach”.
(Carter Leland (Anishinaabe) and David E. Wilkins (Lumber) are professors of Native American Studies at the University of Minnesota.) A Strange Likeness: Becoming Red and White in Eighteenth-Century North America.
' I AM A RED-SKIN':The Adoption of a Native American Expression (1769–1826)” (PDF). European Review of Native American Studies.
“The Artist in American History: 11-Why the Redskins is a Racist Name ". Sport Mascots, Indian Nations and White Racism.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
' Redskin': A fun team name or racial epithet?” Michael Taylor, a Seneca Indian and an assistant professor at Colgate University: The term “redskin” comes from the Colonial era, when some Native Americans were killed in clashes with newly arrived settlers and others were hunted down for a bounty.
Winona Newspaper Database: The Daily Republican. “Seeking $250 Reward, Settlers Hunted For 'Redskin Scalps' During Extermination Effort”.
“60 Years Of Shocking Redskins Headlines:A sampling of violent wordplay”. “Here are some of the movie clips cited in the Redskins trademark case”.
“12 questions (and answers) that explain the Redskins trademark case”. “United STATES: In a Split Decision, the STAB Affirms Cancellation of REDSKINS Trademarks”.
“Asian-American band “The Slants” overturns USPTO rule on “disparaging” trademarks”. “Government Can't Deny Trademarks Over Offensive Names, Appeals Court Rules”.
“In debate over Redskins name, is the 'R-word' for racism or respect?” “Spokane Tribe of Indians: A Socioeconomic Profile 2013” (PDF).
“School board votes to keep name Bellini Redskins ". “ Redskins “: A Native's Guide To Debating An Inglorious Word”.
Washington Redskins Urged to Lose Name, or Millions in Sponsorships”. ^ “First Peoples Worldwide Leads Investors' Call for NFL Washington Team Name Change”.
^ “FedEx requests Washington Redskins to change team name ". “FedEx calls on Redskins to change name following investors' demands on sponsors”.
^ “Nike pulls Washington Redskins apparel from its website amid team name controversy”. “Nike removes Redskins name, apparel from its website”.
^ Washington Redskins to undergo thorough review of team's name ". Washington Redskins, under pressure from corporate sponsors, reviewing name ".
“As Redskins conduct name review, Native American groups say they haven't heard from team”. “AOC Slams Washington Redskins, Says 'Change Your Name if Team Wants to 'Really Stand For Racial Justice “.
^ “D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser: Redskins need to change team name ". ' Change the name spray-painted on monument to Redskins football team founder”.
Redskins Cling to Team's Name but Erase Former Owner's”. “By Having the Washington R×dskins Host a Game on Thanksgiving, NFL Owners Show Their True Colors”.
^ “Racist Stereotypes and Cultural Appropriations in Sports” (PDF). “Indian tribe launches radio ads against Redskins name ".
“Faith leaders urge Redskins owner Dan Snyder and NFL to change team's name ". The Native American Mascot Controversy: A Handbook.
Fry berg, Stephanie; Markus, Hazel Rose; German, Daphne; Stone, Joseph M. (September 2008). “Of Warrior Chiefs and Indian Princesses: The Psychological Consequences of American Indian Mascots” (PDF).
Chaney, John; Burke, Amanda; Buckley, Edward (January 1, 2011). Examining Implicit Bias towards American Indian People and American Indian Mascots” (PDF).
American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research. “Effect of Exposure to an American Indian Mascot on the Tendency to Stereotype a Different Minority Group”.
“Native American imagery as sports mascots: A new problem”. Redskins fan gives himself an Indian name, gets Angelo Hall's helmet”.
Missing the Point: The Real Impact of Native Mascots and Team Names on American Indian and Alaska Native Youth (Report). “Racist names, mascots are harmful to American Indian and Alaska Native youth, says Center for American Progress”.
“How Washington's Football Team Creates A Hostile Environment For Native American Students”. “The NFL is Teaching Us How To Bully Native American Children”.
^ “Opposition to Use of Stereotypical Native American Images as Sports Symbols and Mascots” (PDF). “Summary of the Resolution Recommending Retirement of American Indian Mascots”.
“Statement by the Council of the American Sociological Association on Discontinuing the Use of Native American Nicknames, Logos and Mascots in Sport”. “AAA Calls on Sports Organizations to Denounce Inappropriate American Indian Mascots” (PDF).
“Why Historians Should Demand the Redskins Change Their Name ". “Before the Redskins Where the Redskins : The Use of Native American Team Names in the Formative Era of American Sports, 1857–1933” (PDF).
^ “NCAA Releases Report on History and Legacy of Washington's Harmful “Indian” Sports Mascot”. “12 questions (and answers) that explain the Redskins trademark case”.
“Letter to The Honorable Maria Cantrell, Chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs” (PDF). “Leaders of Five Tribes gather at Chickasaw Nation's Artesian Hotel for Intertribal Council”.
“Oneida Indian Nation is the tiny tribe taking on the NFL and Dan Snyder over Redskins name ". 2014:015 Calling On the National Football League to End the Use of the Washington D.C.
“Native American Bar Association of Washington, D.C. “National Caucus of Native American State Legislators” (PDF).
^ “SAGE Position on Derogatory Sports Mascots and Team Names” (PDF). “Sherman Alexie on Living Outside Cultural Borders”.
Amy Goodman; Juan González (November 8, 2013). “Change the Mascot: Pressure Grows for NFL Team to Drop Redskins Name and Logo as Thousands Protest”.
“US poll finds widespread support for Redskins name ". “The head of National Museum of the American Indian on what we should all know”.
“Will Controversial Sports Team Names Be Gone in Five Years? “Russell Means, Indian Activist and Fighting Sioux Nickname Critic, Dies at 72”.
“Full text: Resolution on the changing of the Washington Redskins name ". “Civil rights coalition asks Washington Redskins to change name ".
^ “Civil and Human Rights Coalition Applauds Patent Office Decision on Washington Football Team Name ". The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.
“NAACP Statement on the U.S. Patent and Trade Office Decision to Cancel the Washington Football Team's Trademark”. John Woodrow Cox; Mark Make (January 19, 2015).
“Civil rights group closely allied with the NFL calls for the Redskins to change its name ". “ADL Signs Letter Urging Broadcasters To Avoid Using The Name Redskins “.
“U.S. Jewish Reform Groups Call on NFL's Washington Redskins to Change Name ". “Cleveland church calls on Washington Redskins to change name, logo”.
^ “Battle over controversial Redskins name comes to Dallas”. ' It's always been about the hatred of Indian skin': Native Americans, allies protest Washington Redskins in Denver”.
“Metrodome will use Redskins name in stadium despite protests”. “Hundreds gather outside Mall of America Field to protest Redskins name ".
^ “Protesters of Redskins name rally in Glendale”. “In Minnesota, thousands of Native Americans protest Redskins name ".
Washington Redskins Spokesman Says Native Americans 'Proud' Of Name, Team Will Continue To Use It Despite Recent Protest”. “Protesters Speak Out Against Washington's Logo, Mascot At Lambeau Field Sunday: Statewide Task Force Against Native American Mascots Organized Event”.
“American Indian activists seek to rekindle debate on Redskins nickname”. “Daniel Snyder says Redskins will never change name ".
“Letter from Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder to fans”. “Letter from Red Cloud Indian School on the Washington Redskins name ".
“The psychology of why sports fans see their teams as extensions of themselves”. “Roger Goodall defends Washington Redskins nickname”.
^ “Roger Goodall Insists Washington Redskins Won't Change Name After MLB's Indians Ditch Chief Yahoo”. “Poll: Americans Don't Want Name Change”.
“Liberals Fabricate Outrage Over Redskins ': The team name is an anachronism, but a harmless one”. “Retired Patawomeck chief says he'd be offended if Redskins change name ".
“Patawomeck Tribe: Snyder Could Rename the Redskins After Us”. ^ Matthew Brown; Felicia Fonseca (November 27, 2013).
“Woman suing Redskins says Code Talkers honor 'sugarcoats' racism”. Redskins Honor World War II-Era Navajo Code Talkers, Awkwardness Ensues: No one was fooled by the team's publicity stunt”.
Washington Redskins pay for Natives to attend Cardinals game”. “The Redskins now have their own YouTube video about the team name ".
Washington Redskins Defend Name With Help From Native Americans”. ^ Washington NFL team video features Indian Country supporters”.
^ “Loudoun County urges Dan Snyder to change team name ". “London Board of Supervisors votes to send letter requesting name change for Ashburn-based Washington Redskins ".
“The Politics of the Washington Redskins Name Controversy”. “New poll says the large majority of Americans believe Redskins should not change name ".
“N.J. lawmakers introduce Redskins resolutions, ask retailers to avoid the name ". “Minneapolis City Council takes steps to ban offensive nickname from U of M stadium”.
“New York State Lawmakers Denounce Redskins Name, Pass Unanimous Resolution”. “California Assembly votes to urge Washington Redskins to ditch 'degrading' name ".
“Obama: Teams should drop Native American mascots”. “Senate Democrats urge NFL to endorse name change for Redskins ".
“Donald Trump: Redskins a 'positive' name, Washington shouldn't change”. Redskins name change should be discussed, Vincent Gray says”.
“New D.C. Mayor wants Redskins back in city, but with new name ". “Bruce Allen: Redskins won't change name in order to build new home”.
Redskins moving training camp to Richmond in 2013”. “Terry McAuliffe, the Redskins, and the Big Lies of Liberalism”.
“Prince George's County executive calls on Redskins to consider name change”. “Legged considers asking Montgomery council to join in call for renaming Redskins ".
John Woodrow Cox; Jonathan O'Connell (April 11, 2015). “Tug of war for new Redskins' stadium is complicated by name debate”.
Brassily, Gillian R.; McDonnell Into del Rio, Giulia; With, Billy; Wald stein, David (July 10, 2021). “In Campaign Against Racism, Team Names Get New Scrutiny”.
“California schools barred from using Redskins as team name or mascot”. “Amid dueling student protests, a high school will retire its Redskins mascot after 90 years”.
^ “Michigan school scraps Redskins mascot, citing division”. “Forest Hills School District Board votes to retire Anderson High School logo, nickname”.
“A Storm on the Horizon SNU Changes Nickname, Mascot”. “60% Don't Think Washington Redskins Should Change Their Name ".
“NCAA Response to New Poll on R×skins Team Name ". “NASA and UNITY respond to recent Washington NFL team name poll”.
^ “Schools in 2 states just retired Native American mascots. “Survey on Redskins team name found most American Indians believe it to be offensive and racist” (PDF).
California State University, San Bernardino. Washington Redskins name, Native mascots offend more than previously reported”.
^ Fry berg, Stephanie A.; Season, Arianne E.; Brady, Laura M.; Jess op, Nadia; Lopez, Julia J. “Unpacking the Mascot Debate: Native American Identification Predicts Opposition to Native Mascots”.
Social Psychological and Personality Science : 194855061989855. Doi : 10.1177/1948550619898556. Wikimedia Commons has media related to WashingtonRedskinsname controversy.