logo
Archive

Can Peace Exist Without War

author
James Smith
• Sunday, 15 November, 2020
• 12 min read

At the heart of this dogma is the idea that war is a disruption of a state of peace, brought on by greedy warmongers, the military industrial complex or some modern day variation on the old 19th century labels. To perpetuate peace requires more than mutual understanding, tolerance and a willingness to join hands and dance in a circle with a rainbow of colors.

peace war politics platform
(Source: www.the-platform.org.uk)

Contents

Those things can only come about after a great deal of violence, and also often represent a society that is no longer in touch with the realities of the world and its own need for survival. To have peace, one must create a society, a nation and a political space in which domestic and foreign violence is checked.

A revolted youth proceeded to embrace decadence, chaos and anarchy, best exemplified by Dadaism. WW2 appeared to restore something of a moral order, but the rise of nuclear war and MAD, took the apocalyptic warfare of WW1 to an entirely new level, with weapons of mass destruction that threatened to destroy everything in sight.

This sort of bleakness caused even otherwise sensible men to put their faith in international orders and organizations, such as the UN, and the growing enlightenment of humanity, believing that with enough education, a form of reciprocal pacifism could be achieved in which no one would find any purpose in harming anyone, thus ending any need for violence or war. As absurd as such a premise may be, variants of it continue to command the philosophies of foreign affairs on both sides of the Atlantic.

Diplomacy is considered supreme, tolerance is the watchword, and national defense takes a back seat to both. Even war itself has been transformed into “Nation Building”, becoming a tool for this global educational project of reciprocal pacifism, the thinking being that if we can remove dictatorships, we will give their peoples a chance to assert that just like us, they don’t want to fight anymore.

There are no happy endings anywhere in sight, because as it turns out the reasons underlying many wars are not as simple as the proverbial evil tyrant living in his castle and oppressing his people. Today, Stalin, who murdered more Russians than Hitler, is one of Russia’s most popular historical leaders.

allah peace war only deed almighty mercy always think
(Source: www.facebook.com)

Polls suggest that if given democracy, the Egyptian would choose the Muslim Brotherhood, the grandfathers of Islamofascism, who helped birth Al Queen. The bleakness of modern war, whether it is gazing at counters that will launch ICBM missiles that will turn the world into a single great sheet of glass, or maintaining endless patrols against insurgents, has a way of making it seem meaningless, a useless tool of stalemate, an endless waiting game without conclusion or greater meaning.

Policymakers who fear to use the military to destroy the enemy, instead draw out war into an endless exercise in bloodletting with no end in sight. And such wars quickly make the public lose faith in the whole idea of military solutions.

They transform war into a meaningless hopeless farce, thus making pacifism and appeasement seem moral and plausible by comparison. And so the children of the West turn Eloy, and the Warlocks grin and gain strength as they sense that a victory is not too far away.

He is a Shill man Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and his articles appears at its Front Page Magazine site. For some, however, “true” peace is a positive concept, signifying harmony in world affairs, or perhaps well managed social conflict.

There is plenty of authority for the view that, in a chaotic and bloodthirsty world, war and the threat of violence are the essential building blocks for peace and stability. Thinkers in the ancient world, from China to Greece to Rome, regarded military might as essential for the maintenance of international order.

peace war nailhed
(Source: www.nailhed.com)

More recently, this “realist” view of international relations was echoed by US President Theodore Roosevelt when he coined the phrase “speak softly, but carry a big stick”. It is also a matter of being prepared to use force to combat aggression or injustice: war being preferable to a “cowardly peace ”.

At the beginning of the 20th Century G K Chesterton was one of the strongest voices in the UK arguing for a robust response to the specter of German militarism. Resort to war was justified if it was waged for a just cause and with just intentions, if other options had proved useless, if the force used was proportionate to the danger, and if there was a reasonable prospect of success.

Equally, there is a long pacifist tradition, evident not least in Jesus’ exhortation to “love thy enemy” and “turn the other cheek”. More recently Mahatma Gandhi propounded the superiority of non-violent resistance using the concepts of AHIMA and satyagraha, and his commitment to non-violence was only strengthened by the destructive potential of atomic weaponry.

A 2016 conference co-hosted by Pax Christi and the Vatican’s pontifical council argued for a new framework, proposing that the Catholic Church shift away from the concept of just war to a Just Peace approach based on Gospel non-violence ”. Some argue that human history, and especially recent centuries, have witnessed a sharp decrease in fighting and violent mortality.

The rise of the nation state, with its monopoly of violence, helped establish internal order and peace. Since then, the incentives to maintain peace have strengthened in the form of increasing economic interdependence, while the costs and risks of war are becoming prohibitive due to nuclear weapons, new vulnerabilities such as cyber warfare, and the apparent lesson of recent history that wars are becoming increasingly difficult to win.

(Source: e-bezpeci.cz)

Violence was ever-present, and even where peace appeared to be restored, people in reality were living a “Cold War under the shadow of mutually assured destruction. Wars are waged via proxies in the Middle East and the Horn of Africa, or external intervention is denied, as in Ukraine.

In times of peace ”, states wage war against terrorism, against drugs, or indeed against any of a range of social evils. States use legal arguments based on war to justify the targeting of their own citizens in drone strikes in third countries or the imprisonment of suspects without trial.

Posted December 15, '09 10:16pm UTC I don't right one Well, make sure you don't 'left' one either. Then yes... in order to have peace, you do in fact need to have no war.

I don't right one\r \r\well, make sure you don't 'left' one either.\r \r\let's see... without war, can there really be peace ?\r \r\well, seeing as by one of the very definitionsdefinition:\r \r 1. The normal, nonwarring condition of a nation, group of nations, or the world. \r \r\then yes... in order to have peace, you do in fact need to have no war.

But let's say this (hypothetical): We live in a world without war, fighting, drugs...etc. \r \r\NI knew someone would point that out...×Bangs head on wall*\r \r \r\but let's say this (hypothetical): We live in a world without war, fighting, drugs...etc.

force theory state captions ig spam criticism
(Source: www.slideshare.net)

Wouldn't you say it is peaceful, or is at peace ? Posted December 15, '09 10:25pm UTC But let's say this (hypothetical): We live in a world without war, fighting, drugs...etc. Looking at such a world were evil exists, it would be good.

The definition would vary depending on where you stand. But let's say this (hypothetical): We live in a world without war, fighting, drugs...etc.

Looking at such a world were evil exists, it would be good. The definition would vary depending on where you stand. Posted December 15, '09 10:26pm UTC No, he doesn't mean 'right' as in direction.

Anyways, peace can 't existwithoutwar, and war can 't existwithoutpeace. In a world without anything that causes conflict, that would be utopia and be perfect, not peace.

:P\r \r\anyways, peace can 't existwithoutwar, and war can 't existwithoutpeace. In a world without anything that causes conflict, that would be utopia and be perfect, not peace.

diet podcast prison escape covid
(Source: www.annesophie.us)

At least, that's what I think. Posted December 15, '09 10:27pm UTC But let's say this (hypothetical): We live in a world without war, fighting, drugs...etc. There's quite a few different definitions of it as well, so this one would cover the fighting drugs etc.

7. a state of tranquility or serenity But let's say this (hypothetical): We live in a world without war, fighting, drugs...etc. There's quite a few different definitions of it as well, so this one would cover the fighting drugs etc.:\r \r 7.

A state of tranquility or serenityPosted December 15, '09 10:38pm Probably, just humans are to ****ING stupid to stop fighting Probably, just humans are to ****ING stupid to stop fightingPosted December 15, '09 10:46pm Actually everything canexistwithout its opposite counterpart.

Things can still be named that, and you can still be in the state of said item/time/state of being. Posted December 15, '09 10:55pm Before the light was separated from the dark there was no night. Before the light was separated from the dark there was no night. Posted December 15, '09 10:57pm UTC Then yes... in order to have peace, you do in fact need to have no war.

Case closed? Actually everything canexistwithout its opposite counterpart. It doesn't matter if things have an opposite or not.

christmas trenches truce moment football troops english
(Source: www.commondreams.org)

Then yes... in order to have peace, you do in fact need to have no war. \r \r o.\r \r Actually everything canexistwithout its opposite counterpart.

It is plain and simple.\r \r\pragmatism: action or policy dictated by consideration of the immediate practical consequences rather than by theory or dogma\r \r\thinking about this is of no practical use to me, so why should I care? Posted December 15, '09 11:00pm UACIF there was never any war since the beginning of time, wouldn't peace be non-existent or have a different definition? Just because that opposite isn't there at the moment, doesn't mean it's not real.

Just because that opposite isn't there at the moment, doesn't mean it's not real. If there was never any light in the first place, it wouldn't be considered darkness.

So no, peace can 't existwithoutwar. Posted December 15, '09 11:10pm UTCIf there was never any war since the beginning of time, wouldn't peace be non-existent or have a different definition? Just because that opposite isn't there at the moment, doesn't mean it's not real.

If there was never any light in the first place, it wouldn't be considered darkness. [/quoted definition of peace can only existwithoutwar, if there was no war and only peace peace would be considered normal so there would not be a new definition of peace, the word peace itself would become obsolete.

(Source: putnik1.livejournal.com)

If there was never any war since the beginning of time, wouldn't peace be non-existent or have a different definition? Just because that opposite isn't there at the moment, doesn't mean it's not real.

If there was never any light in the first place, it wouldn't be considered darkness. [/quote\r\four definition of peace can only existwithoutwar, if there was no war and only peace peace would be considered normal so there would not be a new definition of peace, the word peace itself would become obsolete. Posted December 15, '09 11:17pm UTC Without any war, there is peace.

That is the definition of peace, a lack of war. There are plenty of definitions for the word 'each' and not all of them have to do with war.

That is the definition of peace, a lack of war. There are plenty of definitions for the word peace and not all of them have to do with war.

\r \r ×golfclap×Posted December 15, '09 11:52pm UTC Actually everything canexistwithout its opposite counterpart. This is true speaking from your current position.

(Source: petrofilm.com)

If there was never any war since the beginning of time, wouldn't peace be non-existent or have a different definition? Just because that opposite isn't there at the moment, doesn't mean it's not real.

If there was never any light in the first place, it wouldn't be considered darkness. This would possibly be true speaking from the other position.

However...\r \r If there was never any war since the beginning of time, wouldn't peace be non-existent or have a different definition? Just because that opposite isn't there at the moment, doesn't mean it's not real.

In a way, the fact that peace exists is almost a bad thing, because it means that there is enough war and violence for there to be peace. \r \r\NIN a way, the fact that peace exists is almost a bad thing, because it means that there is enough war and violence for there to be peace.

That's kind of advanced view of it, but that's kind of what I think about peace. Posted December 16, '09 12:35am UTC Way to ignore my second post. There are plenty of definitions for the word 'each' and not all of them have to do with war.

My post was mostly to point out that any knew knowledge gained from this discussion is of no useful purpose to you in your daily life and is pointless My argument for why there can be peacewithoutwar is purely from the pragmatist's standpoint.

We all know what he means by peace, who cares what the exact definition is? There are plenty of definitions for the word peace and not all of them have to do with war.

\r \r\my post was mostly to point out that any knew knowledge gained from this discussion is of no useful purpose to you in your daily life and is pointless :)\r \r\my argument for why there can be peacewithoutwar is purely from the pragmatist's standpoint.\r \r\we all know what he means by peace, who cares what the exact definition is? I have an extreme hate for Ops, since they tend to try and shift the reader to one side or another.

Other Articles You Might Be Interested In

01: Gym In Waterloo Road Blackpool
02: X470 For Zen 2
03: X470 For Zen 3
04: Fnaf Vr Night 5
05: Fnaf Vr Night 5 Guide
06: Z-Two Restaurant
07: Ashley Walker Do Gastonia Nc
08: Assistir A Lenda Do Zorro Online
09: Assistir A Mascara Do Zorro Online
10: Assistir A Mascara Do Zorro Online Dublado
Sources
1 flixfilmes.org - https://flixfilmes.org/filme/a-mascara-do-zorro-1998-online/
2 superflix.xyz - https://superflix.xyz/filmes/a-mascara-do-zorro/
3 spfilmes.com - https://spfilmes.com/a-mascara-do-zorro/
4 www.superflix.net - https://www.superflix.net/a-mascara-do-zorro-assistir-filme-online-dublado-legendado/
5 netcine.biz - https://netcine.biz/a-mascara-do-zorro/
6 querofilmeshd.online - https://querofilmeshd.online/filme/a-mascara-do-zorro/
7 assistir.one - https://assistir.one/assistir/5282-A-Mascara-do-Zorro
8 www.interfilmes.com - https://www.interfilmes.com/filme_226057_A.Marca.do.Zorro-(Zorro).html
9 cineplayy.blogspot.com - https://cineplayy.blogspot.com/2014/05/assistir-mascara-do-zorro-dublado-online.html
10 cineseries.co - https://cineseries.co/a-marca-do-zorro/
11 cineover.com - https://cineover.com/a-lenda-do-zorro/
12 netcine.online - https://netcine.online/filmes/a-lenda-do-zorro/
13 getfilmes.net - https://getfilmes.net/pt/filme
14 www.dailymotion.com - https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9xbuc
15 selaluadadidalamliang.blogspot.com - https://selaluadadidalamliang.blogspot.com/2018/05/a-lenda-do-zorro-2005-completo-filme.html
16 chrisbain.me - https://chrisbain.me/filmes/baixar-filmes-dublados-a-mascara-do-zorro-6127.php